Over 15 years, we have worked with customers across diverse domains.
February 28, 2022
Existing home-appliances are controlled either by on-device switches or physical remote control. These are based on physical contact/touch. The pandemic situations being witnessed today need no-contact solutions for the foreseeable future. This article identifies the approaches along with their key considerations for selecting a suitable non-touch control mechanism.
1. Voice Control: This is a much implemented feature and is usually integrated with Alexa or Google Assistant. It is possible to build voice control systems without Alexa or Google Assistant, but the flexibility and unit cost to customers have to be understood before proceeding ahead.
2. Gesture Control: Gesture control is again a mature technology, its versatility was first popularized with Microsoft Kinect. Today gesture control has advanced with a variety available from simple IR transceiver to IR camera and full Image recognition based systems.
The key parameters that determine the preferred mode of control are as listed below:
How usable is the system by seniors(elderly) and people with disabilities: stammer, disability of hands, stutter, shiver and shake of hands?
How difficult or easy is it to set up or reconfigure the system?
Does the remote talk-back, does it provide 2-way interaction?
Does the system perform reliability in all environment conditions(light, noise etc)?
What happens if the Alexa or Google Assistant device is non-functional?
What happens if the gesture detection device is lost?
What is the fall-back for seniors(elderly) and people with disabilities?
Remote controls are very low-cost and also have a significant after-sales market. Typical entry-level AC remotes retail from INR 130 onwards.
It has to be understood that Voice or Gesture support makes the product premium, typical retail cost of Alexa controlled Air Conditioners is round INR 40,000 vs INR 29,000 for no-Alexa Air Conditioner
Hassle free firmware updates is a key requirement for modern connected devices, these are required for the following key reasons:
Feature updates
Bug fixes
Security updates
Is the system accessible from the internet?
Does the compromise of the server or anonymous access to the device leak sensitive data?
How is the device audited and tested for security?
The following implementation options exist:
Voice Control: This is possible for voice remote controls, wherein the Wifi module with command processing is integrated into the appliance. In appliances such as air-conditioners this is installed in the In-Door Unit( IDU) itself.
Gesture Control: This can be integrated into a window air conditioner or an air-purifier directly on the Printed Circuit Board Assembly(PCBA). However, this is not feasible in a reliable fashion for systems such as split air-conditioners due to distance from the user.
Voice Control: External Integration involves a WiFi to IR adapter(WIA) or a Voice to IR Adapter(VIA). This approach allows even legacy air-conditioners to be voice enabled. Another advantage being the IR remote is a fallback and no modifications are required for the IDU. The VIA usesa a stand-alone voice processor and does not depend on Google Assistant or Alexa. The WIA or VIA could be mounted on a switchboard or separately powered by a 5V Wall Adapter supply.
Gesture Control: External Integration involves a Gesture to IR adapter(GIA). This approach allows even legacy air-conditioners to be voice enabled. Another advantage being the IR remote is a fallback and no modifications are required for the IDU. The GIA could be mounted on a switchboard or separately powered by a 5V Wall Adapter supply.
Thotaka Tekhnologies provides concept to manufacturing services including certification and qualification as a one-stop provider
Thotaka Tekhnologies has prior experience in realizing the technologies mentioned here-in and can thus accelerate the product development
© Copyright - Thotaka Tekhnologies India Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.